I’m always surprised by my retrospective of the past year’s photos. The year never seems to be quite what it appears. For example, the school trip to Galapagos yielded only a few real “year end” photos. [I must admit to there being a few more than a few due to the personal significance to me of the wildlife, rather than the actual photograph quality!]
What also surprises me is the comparative dearth of wideangle photographs. I see myself primarily as a landscape photographer and I love using wideangle lenses – the wider, the better. Yet, wideangle only accounted for about a third of my shots compared to almost 60% telephoto, of which over half were either 200mm or 300mm. This astounds me.
Here are some stats…
Total # image files in 2015: 3191
(c.f. 2014: 3179; 2013: 3617).
Broken down by focal length, my shooting looks like this:
• Ultra-wideangle (18-23mm): 10%
• Wideangle (24-39mm): 27%
• Normal (40-65mm): 7%
• Short Telephoto (66-199mm): 23%
• Long Telephoto: 200-300mm: 35%
It’s interesting to see “spikes” in the numbers at specific focal lengths:
• 18mm (233 = 7%)
• 24mm (379 = 12%)
• 35mm (159 = 5%)
• 200mm (603 = 19%) and
• 300mm (499 = 16%)
These five specific focal lengths account for 60% of my photos, which seems to coincide with my approach to photography, in that I tend to treat zoom lenses as variable fixed lenses. In other words, with each set-up, I consciously choose the focal length based on the perspective needed for the vision I have of the scene, rather than standing there and zooming to crop. It appears my choices coincide with the extremes of the lens I’ve chosen, which is also inline with my thinking.
To break this down further, I’ll take a quick look at my most successful photos (3 stars and above)…
# rated 3* and above: 371 or 11.3%
(c.f. 2014: 14%; 2013: 16%)
But, what does this mean? Am I becoming a progressively poorer photographer or perhaps more discriminating or…?
By focal length, this breaks down as follows:
• Ultra-wide: 11%
• Wide: 20%
• Normal: 6%
• Short Telephoto: 25%
• Long Telephoto: 37%
I’m nit-picking here, but, again, telephoto is even stronger.
One area I need to work on is my use of black-and-white. This year only 13% of my most successful photos (3*+) are B&W, yet, I love black-and-white and could spend the rest of my life creating only black-and-white photographs. The problem is colour is so seductive as is the instant gratification that comes with colour, both personally and from others viewing my work. It’s unfortunate the number of times I hear something to the effect, “Oh – you don’t have that in colour, do you?”.
So, I’ve whittled those 371 down to the 27 photos shown here. I think these best represent the work I am doing and what is important to me as a photographer. I am still very much an opportunist – one who takes advantage of situations as they arise, rather than being more purposeful in going out to create a specific series of photographs. Over time, I believe I am becoming more purposeful, but I have a ways to go, yet.
If you’ve managed to read this far, congratulations! Here are the 27 photos I’ve selected. Enjoy!
Creative, Contemplative & Close-up